I really enjoyed Smackdown. While I'm not a fan of Ricochet and that style of spot wrestling, to have his match vs an over heel to kick off a show is really smart. The crowd reacted well to both men, and Corbin wasn't hurt by the loss at all. It reminded me of WCW cruiserweights opening Nitro regularly to get the audience hyped for the next couple of hours.
The women's gauntlet wasn't perfect, but it did accomplish two important things in getting over Raquel and Shayna. I can't say where the SD women's division goes from here, but the booking on SD proved that new and credible challengers can easily be found and rebuilt. Both Raquel and Shayna have been removed from any focus, but both got a good jump with their accomplishments in that match. With Charlotte and Ronda still possible at any time, and the rumors of Sasha and Naomi possibly returning, Smackdown could have a very crowded title picture soon enough.
And the Kross return was executed perfectly. First I popped for the music and the production going black and white. Kross attacking Drew was a nice start, but the focus changing to Roman was even better. The Scarlott hourglass part made me mark out a second time. We went from thinking Kross was being a heel when attacking Drew, to not knowing what he'll end up being.
I mentioned this in the discussion about Jordynna Grace/women's roster in the other thread, but one thing I hope WWE quickly adjusts to is explaining the new rster members to the main roster audience. NXT does a great job, but it's obvious that one weakness we've seen from all NXT graduates since 2012 has been improper debuting angles/establishment of character. Putting Iyo in the ring without any background into who she is was hard for me to enjoy, and I've seen all her NXT work from day one. Even a deeper explanation as to why she's joined Bayley would be great. I understand that it seems to be about people who were ignored, but Iyo really wasn't. She was a star in NXT. And obviously the hint is that because she's been off TV for months means she was ignored, but there should be more of a storyline purpose explained to us. This isn't really hard to accomplish. Bayley is strong enough on the mic that a good promo from her could do wonders. But when people list off NXT success vs NXT failures, the main commonality I find is NXT graduates who get established to the audience , vs those who don't. And it isn't an immediate thing either. Big E and Bayley are two NXT graduates who didn't really connect right away, but eventually found the right character or story to get the crowd to accept them. But EC3, Karrion Kross v.1, Keith Lee, Sanity.... the list is endless of people that were brought up to NXT and floundered, and it feels like all or most of them were expected to succeed off the idea that their NXT reputations were enough. The best success stories of people from NXT succeeding on the main roster are those that had a strong debuting angle or a push where the character was explained to the audience.
So on the next SD, Kross or Scarlett need a microphone. Let us know why they are back, who they are, why they feel they can attack Drew and threaten the WWE Champ. Bayley needs to carry some mic work for Dakota and Iyo so that they can matter (likely in the women's tag title tourny) . The production team needs to use the efforts they put into the Summerslam videos for KO and Charlotte, and do that for anyone who will be featured on Mondays and Tuesdays. Start with Ciampa. Whether he's only getting his push because of HHH or not, it'll be an uphill battle if all the Raw audience knows about him is that he tags along with The Miz. That duo has not been explained, and anyone who knows Ciampa from NXT needs that connection even more in my opinion because the current version doesn't fit what we know of the former Tommasso.
This is where the 2.0 show is more impressive than the black and gold NXT. Tiffany Stratton needs a lot of work, but her character is obvious. Same for Tony D'Angelo, Joe Gacy, Andre Chase, Robert Stone, Solo Sikoa...etc. I must add, I'm not saying they are all great characters, but anyone who watches 2.0 knows how they differ from the rest of the roster. This type of attention is needed on the Raw and Blue brands.
The women's gauntlet wasn't perfect, but it did accomplish two important things in getting over Raquel and Shayna. I can't say where the SD women's division goes from here, but the booking on SD proved that new and credible challengers can easily be found and rebuilt. Both Raquel and Shayna have been removed from any focus, but both got a good jump with their accomplishments in that match. With Charlotte and Ronda still possible at any time, and the rumors of Sasha and Naomi possibly returning, Smackdown could have a very crowded title picture soon enough.
And the Kross return was executed perfectly. First I popped for the music and the production going black and white. Kross attacking Drew was a nice start, but the focus changing to Roman was even better. The Scarlott hourglass part made me mark out a second time. We went from thinking Kross was being a heel when attacking Drew, to not knowing what he'll end up being.
I mentioned this in the discussion about Jordynna Grace/women's roster in the other thread, but one thing I hope WWE quickly adjusts to is explaining the new rster members to the main roster audience. NXT does a great job, but it's obvious that one weakness we've seen from all NXT graduates since 2012 has been improper debuting angles/establishment of character. Putting Iyo in the ring without any background into who she is was hard for me to enjoy, and I've seen all her NXT work from day one. Even a deeper explanation as to why she's joined Bayley would be great. I understand that it seems to be about people who were ignored, but Iyo really wasn't. She was a star in NXT. And obviously the hint is that because she's been off TV for months means she was ignored, but there should be more of a storyline purpose explained to us. This isn't really hard to accomplish. Bayley is strong enough on the mic that a good promo from her could do wonders. But when people list off NXT success vs NXT failures, the main commonality I find is NXT graduates who get established to the audience , vs those who don't. And it isn't an immediate thing either. Big E and Bayley are two NXT graduates who didn't really connect right away, but eventually found the right character or story to get the crowd to accept them. But EC3, Karrion Kross v.1, Keith Lee, Sanity.... the list is endless of people that were brought up to NXT and floundered, and it feels like all or most of them were expected to succeed off the idea that their NXT reputations were enough. The best success stories of people from NXT succeeding on the main roster are those that had a strong debuting angle or a push where the character was explained to the audience.
So on the next SD, Kross or Scarlett need a microphone. Let us know why they are back, who they are, why they feel they can attack Drew and threaten the WWE Champ. Bayley needs to carry some mic work for Dakota and Iyo so that they can matter (likely in the women's tag title tourny) . The production team needs to use the efforts they put into the Summerslam videos for KO and Charlotte, and do that for anyone who will be featured on Mondays and Tuesdays. Start with Ciampa. Whether he's only getting his push because of HHH or not, it'll be an uphill battle if all the Raw audience knows about him is that he tags along with The Miz. That duo has not been explained, and anyone who knows Ciampa from NXT needs that connection even more in my opinion because the current version doesn't fit what we know of the former Tommasso.
This is where the 2.0 show is more impressive than the black and gold NXT. Tiffany Stratton needs a lot of work, but her character is obvious. Same for Tony D'Angelo, Joe Gacy, Andre Chase, Robert Stone, Solo Sikoa...etc. I must add, I'm not saying they are all great characters, but anyone who watches 2.0 knows how they differ from the rest of the roster. This type of attention is needed on the Raw and Blue brands.
Comment